Back to Search Start Over

General Analytical Framework for Design of Flexible Reinforced Earth Structures.

Authors :
Jie Han
Leshchinsky, Dov
Source :
Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering. Nov2006, Vol. 132 Issue 11, p1427-1435. 9p. 1 Black and White Photograph, 2 Diagrams, 9 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Current design methods divide reinforced earth structures into walls and slopes by using an arbitrary face inclination of 70° as the boundary. The required maximum strength of reinforcement computed for reinforced walls are significantly higher than that computed for reinforced slopes even if the inclination is practically the same. Presented is a general analytical framework for design of flexible reinforced earth structures regardless of the slope face inclination. In fact, the framework is consistent for any structural geometry and any applicable slope stability analysis although, for demonstration purposes, the simple Culmann formulation is utilized for simple geometry with zero batter. Using an adequate slope stability formulation, the required tensile resistance of reinforcement for a given layout is calculated so as to produce the same prescribed factor of safety anywhere within the reinforced zone. That is, using the design shear strength of the soil, the required reinforcement resistance along each layer is computed to fully mobilize this shear strength for all possible slip surfaces. That is, a baseline solution is produced for an ideal long-term strength of reinforcement at any location. Consequently, the required strength of the connection between each reinforcement layer and the facing unit can also be determined. This connection strength, however, assumes small facing units with negligibly small shear and moment resistance. Parametric study is conducted to demonstrate the reasonableness of the presented framework. It is shown that the required tensile resistance and connection strength depend on factors such as: reinforcement length; intermediate reinforcement; percent coverage; and quality of fill. When compared with the current AASHTO design for walls, the required maximum long-term strength of the reinforcement as well as the required connection strength in the proposed approach are substantially smaller. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10900241
Volume :
132
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29382682
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1427)