Cite
Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus PR-interval analysis in intrapartum surveillance: a randomised, multicentre trial.
MLA
Strachan, Bryony K., et al. “Cardiotocography Only versus Cardiotocography plus PR-Interval Analysis in Intrapartum Surveillance: A Randomised, Multicentre Trial.” Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9202, Feb. 2000, p. 456. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82012-7.
APA
Strachan, B. K., Van Wijngaarden, W. J., Sahota, D., Chang, A., & James, D. K. (2000). Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus PR-interval analysis in intrapartum surveillance: a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet, 355(9202), 456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82012-7
Chicago
Strachan, Bryony K., Willem J. Van Wijngaarden, Daljit Sahota, Allan Chang, and David K. James. 2000. “Cardiotocography Only versus Cardiotocography plus PR-Interval Analysis in Intrapartum Surveillance: A Randomised, Multicentre Trial.” Lancet 355 (9202): 456. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82012-7.