Cite
Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when two visual inspection methods are combined for cervical cancer prevention.
MLA
Muwonge, Richard, et al. “Assessing the Gain in Diagnostic Performance When Two Visual Inspection Methods Are Combined for Cervical Cancer Prevention.” Journal of Medical Screening, vol. 14, no. 3, Sept. 2007, pp. 144–50. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1258/096914107782066158.
APA
Muwonge, R., Walter, S. D., Wesley, R. S., Basu, P., Shastri, S. S., Thara, S., Mbalawa, C. G., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2007). Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when two visual inspection methods are combined for cervical cancer prevention. Journal of Medical Screening, 14(3), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1258/096914107782066158
Chicago
Muwonge, Richard, Stephen D. Walter, Ramani S. Wesley, Partha Basu, Surendra S. Shastri, Somanathan Thara, Charles Gombe Mbalawa, and Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan. 2007. “Assessing the Gain in Diagnostic Performance When Two Visual Inspection Methods Are Combined for Cervical Cancer Prevention.” Journal of Medical Screening 14 (3): 144–50. doi:10.1258/096914107782066158.