The Relative and Absolute Impact of Therapies for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) on 6 Month Events: A Nested Case–Control Analysis of the Australian Collaborative Acute Coronary Syndromes Prospective Audit (ACACIA)

MLA

Huynh, Luan T., et al. “The Relative and Absolute Impact of Therapies for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) on 6 Month Events: A Nested Case–Control Analysis of the Australian Collaborative Acute Coronary Syndromes Prospective Audit (ACACIA).” Heart, Lung & Circulation, vol. 16, no. s2, June 2007, pp. S126–27. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2007.06.320.

APA

Huynh, L. T., Astley, C., Amerena, J., Brieger, D., Coverdale, S., Rankin, J., Lehman, S., & Chew, D. (2007). The Relative and Absolute Impact of Therapies for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) on 6 Month Events: A Nested Case–Control Analysis of the Australian Collaborative Acute Coronary Syndromes Prospective Audit (ACACIA). Heart, Lung & Circulation, 16(s2), S126–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2007.06.320

Chicago

Huynh, Luan T., Carolyn Astley, John Amerena, David Brieger, Steve Coverdale, James Rankin, Sam Lehman, and Derek Chew. 2007. “The Relative and Absolute Impact of Therapies for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) on 6 Month Events: A Nested Case–Control Analysis of the Australian Collaborative Acute Coronary Syndromes Prospective Audit (ACACIA).” Heart, Lung & Circulation 16 (s2): S126–27. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2007.06.320.