Does Probability Interference Exist In Social Science?

In this paper we discuss the rationale why sub(super)-additive probabilities in a psychological setting could be explained via the use of quantum probability interference. We propose to measure the complementarity of two variables: i) time of processing (by experiment participants) of (non-moving) images and ii) the ability (by experiment participants) of recognizing deformations of (non-moving) pictures. We argue in the paper why we can not find this complementarity using the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The paper provides for the details on the experimental set up to test the complementarity. © 2007 American Institute of Physics [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]