Back to Search Start Over

Initial Clinical Experience with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Utilizing a Magnetic Navigation System.

Authors :
GALLAGHER, PETER
MARTIN, LAURA
ANGEL, LORI
TOMASSONI, GERY
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Feb2007, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p174-180. 7p. 2 Diagrams, 1 Chart, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Introduction: The placement of left ventricular (LV) leads during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) involves many technical difficulties. These difficulties increase procedural times and decrease procedural success rates. Methods and Results: A total of 50 patients with severe cardiomyopathy (mean LV ejection fraction was 21 ± 6%) and a wide QRS underwent CRT implantation. Magnetic navigation (Stereotaxis, Inc.) was used to position a magnet-tipped 0.014″ guidewire (Cronus™ guidewire) within the coronary sinus (CS) vasculature. LV leads were placed in a lateral CS branch, either using a standard CS delivery sheath or using a “bare-wire” approach without a CS delivery sheath. The mean total procedure time was 98.1 ± 29.1 minutes with a mean fluoroscopy time of 22.7 ± 15.1 minutes. The mean LV lead positioning time was 10.4 ± 7.6 minutes. The use of a delivery sheath was associated with longer procedure times 98 ± 32 minutes vs 80 ± 18 minutes (P = 0.029), fluoroscopy times 23 ± 15 minutes vs 13 ± 4 minutes (P = 0.0007) and LV lead positioning times 10 ± 6 minutes vs 4 ± 2 minutes (P = 0.015) when compared to a “bare-wire” approach. When compared with 52 nonmagnetic-assisted control CRT cases, magnetic navigation reduced total LV lead positioning times (10.4 ± 7.6 minutes vs 18.6 ± 18.9 minutes; P = 0.005). If more than one CS branch vessel was tested, magnetic navigation was associated with significantly shorter times for LV lead placement (16.2 ± 7.7 minutes vs 36.4 ± 23.4 minutes; P = 0.004). Conclusions: Magnetic navigation is a safe, feasible, and efficient tool for lateral LV lead placement during CRT. Magnetic navigation during CRT allows for control of the tip direction of the Cronus™ 0.014″ guidewire using either a standard CS delivery sheath or “bare-wire” approach. Although there are some important limitations to the 0.014″ Cronus™ magnetic navigation can decrease LV lead placement times compared with nonmagnetic-assisted control CRT cases, particularly if multiple CS branches are to be tested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10453873
Volume :
18
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23718873
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00711.x