The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.

<bold>Objectives: </bold>An experiment was conducted to assess the effects of distraction mitigation strategies on drivers' performance and productivity while engaged in an in-vehicle information system task.<bold>Background: </bold>Previous studies show that in-vehicle tasks undermine driver safety and there is a need to mitigate driver distraction.<bold>Method: </bold>An advising strategy that alerts drivers to potential dangers and a locking strategy that prevents the driver from continuing the distracting task were presented to 16 middle-aged and 12 older drivers in a driving simulator in two modes (auditory, visual) and two road conditions (curves, braking events).<bold>Results: </bold>Distraction was a problem for both age groups. Visual distractions were more detrimental than auditory ones for curve negotiation, as depicted by more erratic steering, F (6, 155) = 26.76, p < .05. Drivers did brake more abruptly under auditory distractions, but this effect was mitigated by both the advising, t (155) = 8.37, p < .05, and locking strategies, t (155) = 8.49, p < .05. The locking strategy also resulted in longer minimum time to collision for middle-aged drivers engaged in visual distractions, F (6, 138) = 2.43, p < .05.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Adaptive interfaces can reduce abrupt braking on curve entries resulting from auditory distractions and can also improve the braking response for distracted drivers.<bold>Application: </bold>These strategies can be incorporated into existing in-vehicle systems, thus mitigating the effects of distraction and improving driver performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]