Back to Search Start Over

Pragmatic comparison of β2-agonist side effects within the Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta Agonists Study

Authors :
Chan, Jerry
Cabrol, Dominique
Ingemarsson, Ingemar
Marsal, Karel
Moutquin, Jean-Marie
Fisk, Nicholas M.
Source :
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology. Sep2006, Vol. 128 Issue 1/2, p135-141. 7p.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: While β2-agonists for the acute treatment of preterm labour unequivocally reduce the odds of delivery within 48h and 7 days, they have been associated with substantial maternal and fetal side effects. We aimed to compare side effect profiles of β2-agonist tocolytics. Study design: Pragmatic comparison of ritodrine, salbutamol and terbutaline from re-analysis of data obtained within three comparator arms of three simultaneous comparable randomised controlled trials of β2-agonists against atosiban in 742 women in preterm labour. The prevalence of categoric side effects between treatment groups was analysed using a χ 2 test. The differences in continuous variables between treatment groups were analysed in analyses of covariance. Results: The prevalence of categoric side effects was similar with the three drugs, with the exception of the subjective symptom of palpitations (ritodrine 24.0%, terbutaline 9.3% and salbutamol 12.3%, P =0.003). There were also some differences in maternal diastolic blood pressure (P <0.001) and serum glucose levels (P <0.001), although these were small (<3mmHg and ≤2.8mmol/L, respectively) and clinically unimportant. Conclusion: Side effects were common with all three drugs. Thus, choosing one β2-agonist over the other to minimise side effects has little rationale, especially now that safer tocolytics are available. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03012115
Volume :
128
Issue :
1/2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22372878
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.030