Back to Search
Start Over
Representing dialogic argumentation
- Source :
-
Knowledge-Based Systems . Mar2006, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p22-31. 10p. - Publication Year :
- 2006
-
Abstract
- Abstract: Dialogic argumentation is a crucial component in many computational domains, and forms a core component of argumentation theory. This paper compares two approaches to dialogue that have grown from two different disciplines; the descriptive–normative approach of applied philosophy, and the formal, implemented approach of computer science. The commonalities between the approaches are explored in developing a means for representing dialogic argumentation in a common format. This common format uses an XML-based language that views locutions as state-changing operations, drawing on an analogy with classical artificial intelligence planning. This representation is then shown to hold a number of important advantages in areas of artificial intelligence and philosophy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Subjects :
- *DIALOGUE
*COMPUTER science
*APPLIED philosophy
*XML (Extensible Markup Language)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09507051
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 19913802
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2005.08.002