Back to Search
Start Over
The contribution of the visual modality to vowel perception in native and non-native speakers.
- Source :
-
Journal of Phonetics . Jan2025, Vol. 108, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. - Publication Year :
- 2025
-
Abstract
- • The impact of visual cues on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for native listeners is studied. • The audiovisual benefit of visually salient cues varies across vowel features and speaker L1. • Lip-rounding in French productions of /ɔː/ and /ə/ have a smaller, or negative AV benefit, compared to English speakers. • French productions showed inappropriate visual cues for L2 contrasts (/æ ʌ ɑː/) not present in the L1. • The influence of L1 visual gestures on L2 production may negatively affect intelligibility. This study examines how visual cues impact the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for native listeners. English CVC words with vowels involving salient (e.g., lip-spreading for /iː/) and non-salient visual cues (neutral lips for /ɪ/) produced by two French speakers and a native English control, were presented to native English listeners who identified the word heard. Tokens were presented in both auditory-only and audiovisual (AV) mode in cafeteria noise at −15 dB SNR. The visual cues analysed were lip spreading, lip rounding, jaw opening and tongue frontness in vowels, as well as lip-rounding in schwa. Visually salient cues improved vowel intelligibility, compared to non-visual cues, but the audiovisual benefit varied across vowel features and speaker groups. The presence of lip-spreading for /iː/ (vs /ɪ/) and jaw-opening for /æ/ (vs /ɪ/) enhanced intelligibility (i.e., larger AV benefit) for both speaker groups. However, compared to the English speaker, lip-rounding in /ɔː/ and /ə/ produced by French speakers (likely accompanied by lip protrusion) had a smaller, or negative AV benefit. These results suggest that the influence of L1 gestures on L2 production may reduce or negatively affect intelligibility. Furthermore, French productions of /ɑː/ exhibited unusually high AV benefits, suggesting an extreme jaw-opening for this vowel in an attempt to distinguish between L2 contrasts (/æ ʌ ɑː/) not present in the L1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00954470
- Volume :
- 108
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Phonetics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 182566893
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101375