Back to Search Start Over

Real world analysis of the efficacy and safety of eribulin compared to utidelone in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors :
Feng, Mengya
Bi, Pingping
Kang, Yihua
Yang, Dechun
Ren, Shengnan
Lu, Xianping
Xie, Guojian
Lei, Hai
Mo, Dan
Source :
Cancer Cell International. 12/19/2024, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-21. 21p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of subsequent chemotherapy with single eribulin or utidelone combined with a capecitabine regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously been treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel. Methods: This work was a retrospective analysis of 85 patients from July 2018 to July 2023. Forty-two and 43 patients were treated with the eribulin regimen and the utidelone/capecitabine regimen, respectively. The endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, the objective remission rate and safety. Survival analyses and multifactorial analyses were performed via the Kaplan‒Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression models. Results: As of 15 April 2024, the mPFS durations of the patients in the utidelone/capecitabine and eribulin treatment groups were 7.7 and 5.2 months, respectively, and the mOS durations were 22.0 and 18.2 months, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that in advanced first-line therapy, the mPFS durations of the utidelone/capecitabine group and the eribulin group were 11.8 and 7.0 months, respectively, and this difference was significant. In the eribulin treatment arm, the mPFS of first-line therapy was 7.0, whereas it was 3.3 months for posterior-line therapy, and this difference was significant. The most common adverse reactions were neurotoxicity, hand‒foot syndrome, hematological toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and abnormalities in hepatic and renal functions. Conclusions: In conclusion, either utidelone/capecitabine or eribulin chemotherapy may result in a survival benefit with a tolerable adverse effect profile and favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The first-line use of eribulin resulted in better PFS and ORR than posterior-line use, and the combination of utidelone/capecitabine represents a more efficacious approach in the advanced first-line therapy of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14752867
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer Cell International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181827991
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-024-03608-7