Back to Search Start Over

Lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation sequential therapy offers survival benefits for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at intermediate stage and the liver reserve of Child–Pugh A category: A multicenter study.

Authors :
Zhang, Ying
Numata, Kazushi
Imajo, Kento
Uojima, Haruki
Funaoka, Akihiro
Komiyama, Satoshi
Ogushi, Katsuaki
Chuma, Makoto
Irie, Kuniyasu
Kokubu, Shigehiro
Yoneda, Masato
Kobayashi, Takashi
Hidaka, Hisashi
Fukushima, Taito
Kobayashi, Satoshi
Morimoto, Manabu
Kagawa, Tatehiro
Hattori, Nobuhiro
Watanabe, Tsunamasa
Iwase, Shigeru
Source :
Hepatology Research. Dec2024, Vol. 54 Issue 12, p1174-1192. 19p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation (RFA) sequential therapy for certain hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods: One hundred and nineteen patients with unresectable HCC in the intermediate stage with Child–Pugh A were retrospectively recruited in a multicenter setting. Those in the lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy group received lenvatinib initially, followed by RFA and the retreatment with lenvatinib. The study compared overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) between patients undergoing sequential therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy. Results: After propensity score matching, 25 patients on sequential therapy and 50 on monotherapy were evaluated. Independent factors influencing OS were identified as sequential therapy, modified albumin–bilirubin (mALBI) grade, and relative dose intensity (%) with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.381 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.186–0.782), 2.220 (95% CI, 1.410–3.493), and 0.982 (95% CI, 0.966–0.999), respectively. Stratified analysis based on mALBI grades confirmed the independent influence of treatment strategy across all mALBI grades for OS (HR, 0.376; 95% CI, 0.176–0.804). Furthermore, sequential therapy was identified as an independent factor of PFS (HR, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.215–0.678). Sequential therapy significantly outperformed monotherapy on survival benefits (OS: 38.27 vs. 18.96 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p = 0.004; PFS: 13.80 vs. 5.32 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p < 0.001). Sequential therapy was significantly associated with complete response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (odds ratio, 63.089). Ten of 119 patients experienced grade 3 AEs, with no AE beyond grade 3 observed. Conclusion: Lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy might offer favorable tolerability and potential prognostic improvement compared to lenvatinib monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13866346
Volume :
54
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Hepatology Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181259229
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14089