What drives inequalities in Low Emission Zones' impacts on job accessibility?

Low-emission zones (LEZs) aim to improve urban air quality and reduce emissions but often face public opposition due to their regressive impacts on accessibility. However, the causes of these regressive impacts remain poorly understood. This study investigates the factors driving inequalities in the impacts of LEZs on job accessibility across occupational categories in eight French cities. Using ex-ante open-source data, it computes expected job accessibility losses due to LEZs per occupational category. Additionally, it provides a counterfactual decomposition of the disparities in LEZs' impacts between six drivers: ownership of polluting vehicles, workers' residences and workplaces within the LEZ, accessibility of workers' homes and workplaces via public transportation, and feasibility of active transportation modes for commuting between homes and workplaces. The findings reveal that LEZs are predominantly regressive in six out of the eight cities examined. Despite a higher concentration of high-income workers and jobs within LEZs, resulting in significant accessibility losses for this group, low-income workers bear a greater burden due to the limited availability of public transportation near their residences and workplaces, longer commutes to work, and higher shares of polluting vehicles. These findings help inform potential complementary policies to address the regressive effects of LEZs. • This paper analyzes Low Emission Zones' (LEZ) impacts on access to jobs in 8 French cities. • LEZs have regressive impacts in 6 out of the 8 cities studied. • It decomposes between 6 key drivers that may explain disparities in LEZ impacts. • Urban forms and polluting vehicle ownership play against unskilled workers. • Policy design plays in favor of unskilled workers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]