Deadwood manipulation and type determine assemblage composition of saproxylic beetles and fungi after a decade.

The biodiversity crisis calls for immediate restoration of deteriorated and rare habitat. Due to fire suppression and intensive forest management, boreal pine forests of high conservation value are exceptionally rare. Despite decades of restoration research in boreal forests, relatively few studies have evaluated multi-taxon biodiversity response of restoration measures in pine forests. In a Scots pine experiment, we investigated biodiversity patterns of wood-inhabiting fungi and beetles a decade after restoration (prescribed burning and deadwood creation) and forest management (harvest with varying retention). We found that fungi and beetles develop differently and have distinct preferences in deadwood originating from restoration. Standing deadwood supported more species for beetles and lying deadwood for fungi and for both taxa, standing and lying deadwood harboured different species assemblages. Burned deadwood displayed less variable assemblages than unburned deadwood for both organism groups. We found that, after a decade, deadwood type and not harvest with different retention levels better explained diversity patterns of wood-inhabiting beetles and fungi in pine forests. Pine forests are naturally prone to recurring disturbances creating open light conditions. Pine-associated species are therefore likely resistant to disturbance as long as a variety of deadwood resources are present. To accommodate multiple taxa, a variety of substrate and environment types is required. Beetles benefit from standing deadwood while fungi benefit from lying deadwood. To support assemblages with both rapid and slow turnover rates, a combination of recurring restoration and leaving restored stands in the adjacent landscapes is required. • Substrate type was more influential than retention level for saproxylic biodiversity. • Logs host more fungal species than snags. • Snags host more beetle species than logs. • Deadwood types hosted different saproxylic assemblages. • Different deadwood types and decay stages are needed to support saproxylic biodiversity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]