Back to Search Start Over

Simultaneous versus staged approach in transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe stenosis and endovascular aortic repair for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors :
Gallitto, Enrico
Spath, Paolo
Faggioli, Gian Luca
Saia, Francesco
Palmerini, Tullio
Piazza, Michele
D'Oria, Mario
Simonte, Gioele
Cappiello, Antonio
Isernia, Giacomo
Gelpi, Guido
Rizza, Antonio
Piffaretti, Gabriele
Gargiulo, Mauro
Group, the Italian Multicenter T/EVAR + TAVI Study's
Source :
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Nov2024, Vol. 66 Issue 5, p1-8. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic stenosis may be concomitant diseases requiring both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (T/EVAR) in high-risk patients for surgical approaches, but temporal management is not clearly defined yet. The aim of the study was to analyse outcomes of simultaneous versus staged TAVI and T/EVAR. METHODS Retrospective observational multicentre study was performed on patients requiring TAVI and T/EVAR from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 'Simultaneous group' if T/EVAR + TAVI were performed in the same procedure and 'Staged group' if T/EVAR and TAVI were performed in 2 steps, but within 3 months. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30-day mortality/major adverse events and follow-up survival. Secondary outcomes were procedural metrics and length of stay. RESULTS Forty-four cases were collected; 8 (18%) had T/EVAR and 36 (82%) had EVAR, respectively. Upon temporal determination, 25 (57%) and 19 (43%) were clustered in Simultaneous and Staged groups, respectively. In Staged group, median time between procedures was 72 (interquartile range—IQR: 57–87) days. Preoperative and intraoperative figures were similar. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 1/19; P = 0.43). Pulmonary events (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 5/19; P = 0.01) and need of postoperative cardiac pacemaker (Simultaneous: 2/25 versus Staged: 7/19; P = 0.02) were more frequent in Staged patients. The overall length of stay was lower in the Simultaneous group [Simultaneous: 7 (IQR: 6–8) versus Staged: 19 (IQR: 15–23) days; P = 0.001]. The median follow-up was 25 (IQR: 8–42) months and estimated 3-year survival was 73% with no difference between groups (Simultaneous: 82% versus Staged: 74%; P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Both Simultaneous or Staged T/EVAR and TAVI procedures are effective with satisfactory outcomes. Despite the small numbers, simultaneous repair seems to reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications, maintaining similar follow-up survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10107940
Volume :
66
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181152835
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae379