Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate‐1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX‐MF Real‐World Study.

Authors :
Palandri, Francesca
Elli, Elena M.
Morsia, Erika
Benevolo, Giulia
Tiribelli, Mario
Beggiato, Eloise
Bonifacio, Massimiliano
Farina, Mirko
Martino, Bruno
Caocci, Giovanni
Pugliese, Novella
Tieghi, Alessia
Crugnola, Monica
Binotto, Gianni
Cavazzini, Francesco
Abruzzese, Elisabetta
Iurlo, Alessandra
Isidori, Alessandro
Bosi, Costanza
Guglielmana, Veronica
Source :
Cancer (0008543X). 12/15/2024, Vol. 130 Issue 24, p4257-4266. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the therapy of myelofibrosis (MF) based on clinical trials including only intermediate2‐high risk (INT2/HIGH) patients. However, RUX is commonly used in intermediate‐1 (INT1) patients, with scarce information on responses and outcome. Methods: The authors investigated the benefit of RUX in 1055 MF patients, included in the "RUX‐MF" retrospective study. Results: At baseline (BL), 595 (56.2%) patients were at INT1‐risk according to DIPSS (PMF) or MYSEC‐PM (SMF). The spleen was palpable at <5 cm, between 5 and 10 cm, and >10 cm below costal margin in 5.9%, 47.4%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively; 300 (54.1%) were highly symptomatic (total symptom score ≥20). High‐molecular‐risk (HMR) mutations (IDH1/2, ASXL‐1, SRSF2, EZH2, U2AF1Q157) were detected in 77/167 patients. A total of 101 (19.2%) patients had ≥1 cytopenia (Hb < 10 g/dL: n.36; PLT <100 x 109/L: n = 43; white blood cells <4 x 109/L: n = 40). After 6 months on RUX, IWG‐MRT–defined spleen and symptoms response rates were 26.8% and 67.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, predictors of SR at 6 months were no HMR mutations odds ratio [OR], 2.0, p =.05], no cytopenia (OR, 2.10; p =.01), and blasts <1% (OR, 1.91; p =.01). In multivariate analysis, absence of HMR maintained a significant association (OR, 2.1 [1.12–3.76]; p =.01). Conclusions: In INT1 patients, responses were more frequent and durable, whereas toxicity rates were lower compared to INT2/high‐risk patients. Presence of HMR mutations, cytopenia, and peripheral blasts identified less‐responsive INT1 patients, who may benefit for alternative therapeutic strategies. Overall survival and event‐free survival rates are significantly superior, whereas rate of ruxolitinib discontinuations is significantly lower in intermediate‐1 patients, confirming the benefits of ruxolitinib in patients with less advanced disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
130
Issue :
24
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181057502
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35489