Accounting for bias due to outcome data missing not at random: comparison and illustration of two approaches to probabilistic bias analysis: a simulation study.

MLA

Kawabata, Emily, et al. “Accounting for Bias Due to Outcome Data Missing Not at Random: Comparison and Illustration of Two Approaches to Probabilistic Bias Analysis: A Simulation Study.” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 24, no. 1, Nov. 2024, pp. 1–14. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02382-4.

APA

Kawabata, E., Major-Smith, D., Clayton, G. L., Shapland, C. Y., Morris, T. P., Carter, A. R., Fernández-Sanlés, A., Borges, M. C., Tilling, K., Griffith, G. J., Millard, L. A. C., Smith, G. D., Lawlor, D. A., & Hughes, R. A. (2024). Accounting for bias due to outcome data missing not at random: comparison and illustration of two approaches to probabilistic bias analysis: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02382-4

Chicago

Kawabata, Emily, Daniel Major-Smith, Gemma L. Clayton, Chin Yang Shapland, Tim P. Morris, Alice R. Carter, Alba Fernández-Sanlés, et al. 2024. “Accounting for Bias Due to Outcome Data Missing Not at Random: Comparison and Illustration of Two Approaches to Probabilistic Bias Analysis: A Simulation Study.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 24 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12874-024-02382-4.