Back to Search Start Over

The impact of updates in headache quality measures on adherence to best practices in a neurology resident clinic: A quality improvement study.

Authors :
Cascella, Robert H.
Anderson, Christopher C.
Perez, Enmanuel J.
Source :
Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain. Nov2024, Vol. 64 Issue 10, p1329-1335. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To apply the 2019 joint American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and American Headache Society (AHS) quality measures for headache management to a cohort of neurology resident physicians and then assess outcomes related to guideline adherence. Background: The optimization of headache management is essential to reduce both the individual and systemic impact of these disorders. In 2014, the AAN developed 10 quality measures for evidence‐based management of patients with headache. A workgroup updated and condensed its headache quality measures in 2019, narrowing the set to six measurements, four of which would primarily focus on the management of migraine and two of which would address the management of cluster headache. Methods: This quality improvement study was conducted using a pretest‐posttest study design. A pre‐intervention survey based on retrospective analysis of five clinic notes for adherence to the measures was designed and distributed to all neurology residents (n = 32) at a large, academic tertiary referral center. The intervention included the creation of an electronic medical record template to aid residents in following the measures during clinical encounters, as well as the provision of direct feedback based on pre‐intervention results. Finally, a post‐intervention survey was distributed for completion based on notes written during the intervention period. Analysis was limited to migraine, given the low percentage of cluster headache seen in clinic. Results: An increase in adherence was seen in three of the four migraine‐related quality measures, with the Use of Abortive Medications for Migraine and Documentation of Counseling on Modifiable Lifestyle and Chronification Factors demonstrating statistically significant improvements (75.8% to 88.0% [p = 0.013] and 83.9% to 94.0% [p = 0.029] adherence, respectively). For secondary outcomes, the increase in the utilization of appropriate diagnostic criteria (82.6% to 93.2%, p = 0.018) was significant, and the self‐assessed confidence rating for adherence to guidelines was significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the quality improvement intervention led to increased adherence to the AAN and AHS migraine‐related measures. It is anticipated that increased adherence may lead to improved patient outcomes. Plain Language Summary: In 2019, the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society worked together to create a set of quality measures to guide clinicians in the care of patients with headache; however, we do not know if these guidelines are being followed. This study aimed to see if resident neurologists at a large academic medical center would better follow these guidelines if they were part of a standardized electronic medical record template. Overall, this study showed that applying the headache quality measures in a real clinical setting is feasible and can improve best‐care practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00178748
Volume :
64
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180775220
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14754