The effect of manipulation under anesthesia on knee kinematics in individuals with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Background: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been recommended for refractory arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the effectiveness of MUA to restore normal kinematics of the arthrofibrotic knee is still unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) in patients with arthrofibrosis before and after MUA. Methods: Computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system were used to assess in vivo knee kinematics. Ten patients (6 women and 4 men; 32.6 ± 6.5y, 168.4 ± 7.8 cm, 61.8 ± 13.2 kg) were included in this study. The tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in 6DOF were collected before and one year after MUA. A simple analysis of variance was used to evaluate kinematic data of preoperative arthrofibrotic knee, postoperative arthrofibrotic knee, and the contralateral knee. Results: The patella in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee shifted significantly more inferiorly compared to the preoperative knee at 45° (P = 0.010), 60° (P = 0.008), and 75° (P = 0.049) of flexion. The patellar flexion in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee significantly increased at 45° (P = 0.048), 60° (P = 0.037), and 75° (P = 0.006) of flexion compared to the preoperative arthrofibrotic knee. The patellar tilt was significantly decreased at 60° (P = 0.006) and at 75° (P = 0.037) of knee flexion in the postoperative arthrofibrotic knee compared to the contralateral knee. MUA significantly increased tibial internal rotation angle in the arthrofibrotic knee at 45° (P = 0.047), at 60° (P = 0.033), and at 75° (P = 0.021) of knee flexion. Conclusions: MUA could restore normal patellar inferior shift, flexion, and tibial rotation compared to the contralateral side. However, the MUA could not restore normal patellar tilt of the arthrofibrotic knee. This indicated that improvement of patellar tilt should be emphasized in postoperative rehabilitation. Highlights: The abnormal knee kinematics has been thought to be an important factor contributing to the associated joint degeneration in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Despite the effectiveness of MUA in the ROM gains for patients with knee arthrofibrosis, the effectiveness of MUA to restore normal knee kinematics in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction is still unclear. The MUA could restore normal patellar inferior shift, flexion, and tibial rotation. The MUA could not restore normal patellar tilt of the arthrofibrotic knee, indicating that improvement of patellar tilt should be emphasized in postoperative rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]