Cervical squamous cell carcinoma outcomes across continents: A retrospective study.

To assess the influence of geographies and race on the survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) across three continents. This multicontinental retrospective study was conducted in 8 hospitals across Asia, Europe, and North America (NA). Clinicopathologic data of 595 patients with presumed early stages of CSCC, treated surgically, with curative intent was collected. Descriptive analysis and Cox regression models were produced. A total of 595 patients, consisting of 445 (74.8 %) white, 75 (12.6 %) Blacks, and 75 (12.6 %) Asian patients were included. Geographical distribution comprised 69 % of patients from NA, 22 % from Europe, and 9 % from Asia. The median age at diagnosis was 46 years. The median overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 22.09 years and 21.19 years, respectively. Patient characteristics varied significantly across geographical regions, except for consensus tumor grade. Patients in Europe from middle-income countries with limited CC screening had a substantially higher risk of death than those in NA (HR, 1.79; 95 % CI, 1.13 to 2.79; p = 0.015). Patients from single center in Japan had higher risk of relapse than those from the four heterogeneous NA centers (sub-distribution hazard ratio, 2.19; 95 % CI, 1.22 to 3.95; p = 0.009), although OS did not differ significantly. Race remained statistically insignificant for survival outcomes across the three continents but seemed to influence survival outcomes in NA centers. Our study highlights impact of geographies and races on CSCC survival outcomes, emphasizing the need of considering these factors when developing targeted interventions against CSCC. • Significant association between the cervical cancer relapse rate and geographical region. • No significant association between the cervical cancer survival outcomes and race across the three continents. • Race influenced cervical cancer survival outcomes in North American institutes. • No significant differences in survival outcomes when comparing Black and non-Black patients in North America. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]