A Practice-Oriented Approach for Seismic and Energy Performance Upgrading of Existing Buildings.

Recent studies have focused on identifying the optimal seismic and energy upgrading interventions, among different alternatives, for poorly performing existing buildings. Most of such studies use detailed methodologies to assess the seismic and energy performance of buildings, which are time and computationally demanding, making it nearly unfeasible for practitioners and decision-makers to use them, rendering practice-oriented approaches extremely needed. To overcome the current limitations of more research-oriented methods, this study employs different available simplified approaches, namely SPO2FRAG, cloud-based capacity spectrum method and the Italian seismic risk classification guidelines (Sismabonus), to estimate some of the variables considered when using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to select the optimal combined retrofitting strategy, among a set of different options. To this end, a case-study school building was selected and four seismic retrofitting solutions, combined with three energy-based interventions, were identified. The performance of the building, in its as-built and retrofitted conditions, was analysed considering both simplified and detailed approaches for the estimation of two of the seismic-related variables, namely annual probability of failure and expected annual losses. Such simplified and refined estimates were used as MCDM input, comparing the ranking of retrofitting combined alternatives obtained in both cases, demonstrating the suitability of the proposed simplified methodology for engineering practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]