Back to Search Start Over

Effect of wettability on the void formation during liquid infusion into fibers.

Authors :
Turner, Jared
Lippert, Daniel
Seo, Dongjin
Grasinger, Matthew
George, Andy
Source :
Polymer Composites. 11/10/2024, Vol. 45 Issue 16, p14931-14942. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Liquid composite molding (LCM) is a promising option for low‐cost manufacturing of high‐performance composites compared to traditional prepreg‐autoclave methods. Void formation may be the most significant roadblock to such adaptation of LCM. In this article, the hypothesis that higher wettability, that is, lower contact angles of liquid on solids, would lead to lower void content for LCM is tested. First, a theory that calculates the energy required to form a bubble with varying contact angles is formulated by considering interfacial energy differences of a system with and without it. To experimentally prove this hypothesis, six different carbon fiber reinforcement samples were prepared each with a different fiber surface treatment. The wettability from the surface treatments was evaluated with contact angle measurements based on capillary rise between two fiber yarns. Void formation in situ during infusion was evaluated by a series of 1D infusion experiments using the same six surface modifications. Of the six samples, the reinforcements coated with fluorinated alkane and aminosilane showed the highest wettability and lowest void content, confirming that a lower contact angle can reduce the formation of voids during the infusion process. Highlights: Higher wettability was correlated with less bubble (void) formation.Theoretical model and LCM experimental confirmation.Various surface modifications of carbon fibers tested.Potential application: enhancement of properties from LCM manufactured parts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02728397
Volume :
45
Issue :
16
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Polymer Composites
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180622445
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.28811