Back to Search
Start Over
How do BMI-restrictive policies impact women seeking NHS-funded IVF in the United Kingdom? A qualitative analysis of online forum discussions.
- Source :
-
Reproductive Health . 10/28/2024, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Plain English Summary: In the United Kingdom, people can access public funding for In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment if certain criteria are met. Funding restrictions differ between geographical areas, but most areas restrict treatment to women with a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 30. This study explores the unexpected and unintended harms experienced by women restricted from NHS-funded IVF due to these BMI criteria. Posts from a popular infertility online forum were collected and thematically analysed. The study found moralising discourses around body weight which emphasized that women had personal control over their bodies and needed to 'work' to change their bodies to show deservingness for treatment. We conclude that NHS-IVF policies in the UK overlook the emotional and moral burdens placed on individuals due to rigid BMI criteria. As the impact of BMI limits on healthcare access is an under-researched topic, we believe this work is important for demonstrating the harms of BMI-restrictive policies. Background: Across the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), women with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of > 30 face restrictions accessing In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment. This study asks: what are the (un)expected and (un)intended harms and consequences experienced by women restricted from accessing NHS-funded IVF due to BMI threshold criteria? Methods: Posts from a popular infertility online forum were collected and reflexively thematically analysed. Results: On the forum, users discussed how they struggled to lose weight, how they faced time pressures to meet BMI thresholds, and they shared knowledge on how to comply or appear compliant with BMI cut-offs. Our study found widespread moral discourses around body weight were reproduced in the forum, particularly commonplace narratives that body weight is under personal control, that people with a high BMI should 'work' to change their bodies, and that this work helps demonstrate deservingness for IVF treatment. Moralising discourses around weight were linked to the responsibilities of a hoped-for future of motherhood, as users performed deservingness through emphasising their commitment to meeting the BMI threshold. Conclusion: We conclude that NHS-IVF policies in the United Kingdom do not consider the burdensome emotional and moral work placed on people seeking treatment due to inflexible upper-limit BMI criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *NATIONAL health services
*HEALTH services accessibility
*REPRODUCTIVE health
*BODY mass index
*WOMEN
*QUALITATIVE research
*INTERNET forums
*RESEARCH funding
*HEALTH policy
*BODY weight
*HELP-seeking behavior
*EMOTIONS
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*THEMATIC analysis
*ETHICS
*FERTILIZATION in vitro
*CONCEPTUAL structures
*MATHEMATICAL models
*WOMEN'S health
*THEORY
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17424755
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Reproductive Health
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 180519516
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01891-1