Back to Search
Start Over
Variability in Kidney Cancer Treatment and Survival in England: Results of a National Cohort Study.
- Source :
-
Clinical Oncology . Nov2024, Vol. 36 Issue 11, pe429-e438. 10p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- To establish whether there are geographic differences in treatments and outcomes for patients with kidney cancer (KC) in England which could potentially be improved by the creation of national guidelines. A multidisciplinary group convened by the charity Kidney Cancer UK developed Quality Performance Indicators (QPIs) for the treatment of KC. Adherence to these QPIs was reported for all patients with a histological diagnosis of KC diagnosed in England between 2017 and 2018. Utilising data extracted from national datasets, logistic and linear probability models were used to estimate geographic variation in the delivery of surgery and systemic anti-cancer therapy at Cancer Alliance and NHS trust levels. Results were adjusted for a priori confounders, including age at diagnosis, area deprivation of residence, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Differences in overall survival are reported. The cohort comprised 18,640 tumours in 18,421 patients. Of tumours diagnosed, median patient age was 68 (interquartile range 58–77) years and 63.4% were in males. When stratified by Cancer Alliance, the proportions of T1a/T1b/N0/M0 KC that had radical nephrectomy (RN), nephron sparing surgery or ablation ranged from 53.3% (95% CI [48.7, 57.8]) to 80.3% (95% CI [73.0, 86.0]). For stage T1b-3 cancers, the proportion that received RN ranged from 65.6% (95% CI [60.3, 70.5]) to 77.3% (95% CI [72.1, 81.7]). Patients with M0 (n = 12,365) and M1 KC (n = 3312) at diagnosis had 24-month survival of 87.5% and 25.1%, respectively. Of patients diagnosed with M1 KC, 50.3% received systemic anti-cancer therapy, ranging from 39.7% (95% CI [33.7, 46.1]) to 70.7% (95% CI [59.6, 79.8]) between Cancer Alliances. The six-month survival of these patients was 77.4% compared to 27.6% for those that did not receive SACT. These major geographical differences in surgical and systemic therapy practice have led to national guideline development. • Analysis of 18,421 patients with Kidney Cancer presenting in England 2017–18. • Marked variations between Cancer Alliances in rates of surgery for primary kidney cancer. • Systemic anti-cancer therapy improves outcomes in metastatic kidney cancer patients. • Significant variations between Cancer Alliances in systemic anti-cancer therapy use. • Low rates of clinical trial recruitment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *KIDNEY tumors
*CLINICAL medicine
*MEDICAL protocols
*HEALTH services accessibility
*MEDICAL quality control
*PROBABILITY theory
*RESIDENTIAL patterns
*SEX distribution
*KEY performance indicators (Management)
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*POPULATION geography
*CANCER patients
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*AGE distribution
*NEPHRECTOMY
*LONGITUDINAL method
*AGE factors in disease
*SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry)
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*SOCIAL isolation
*OVERALL survival
*REGRESSION analysis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09366555
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 180365334
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.008