Soft Tissue Contours at Pontic Sites With or Without Soft Tissue Grafting—A 15‐Year Follow‐Up of a Controlled Clinical Study.

ABSTRACT Objectives Methods Results Conclusion Clinical Significance To report on soft tissue contour changes at pontic sites with or without soft tissue grafting over an observation period of 15 years.Fourteen patients received a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) in the posterior zone in a controlled clinical study and were available at the 15‐year follow‐up. Eight patients received a subepithelial connective tissue graft in the pontic area (test) while six received the FDP without soft tissue grafting (control). Impressions were taken after FDP cementation and at 15 years. Casts were digitized and a profilometric analysis was performed (mean distance) and the pontic height (PH) and ridge width (RW) were analyzed at the mid‐buccal area. A descriptive analysis and Wilcoxon‐Mann–Whitney test was performed (level of significance: 5%).Profilometric changes (mean distance) from baseline to 15 years amounted to −0.68 mm (test) and to −0.33 mm (control) (p = 0.208), 95% CI for group difference (0.290; −0.750). PH measured −0.47 mm (test) and 0.0 mm (control) (p = 0.079) and RW amounted to −1.05 mm (test) and −0.38 mm (control) (p = 0.138).Remodeling of the soft tissue contour at pontic sites of FDPs was evident in both groups, but slightly more accentuated following soft tissue grafting.This study is the first to report on soft tissue changes at pontic sites over more than 10 years. It investigates whether tissue contour changes with and without soft tissue grafting before the insertion of FDPs. Remodeling of the soft tissue contour at pontic sites was observed over 15 years, with more pronounced changes when soft tissues were augmented with SCTGs before FDP insertion. The volume loss at the augmented site must be considered in relation to the overall tissue changes over long periods. Connective tissue grafts reliably improve shape and esthetics around the pontic unit. Further long‐term studies with more patients are needed to evaluate the initial gains and long‐term performance of these augmentations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]