Impact of robotic gastrectomy in patients with primary T3 or more advanced gastric cancer.

Background: The use of robotic surgery (RS) for gastric cancer (GC) has been rapidly increasing. However, the utility of RS for advanced GC (AGC), especially T3 or more AGC, is unclear. Methods: Ninety patients who underwent curative upfront minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (D2 lymph node dissection) for fStage II or III GC were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 68 underwent MIS for T3 or more AGC. Thirty‐six patients underwent RS, and 32 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (LS). The short‐term and long‐term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: In the T3 or more AGC cohort, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The number of retrieved lymph nodes tended to be higher in the RS than LS group (38.5 vs. 33.0, p =.11). The drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 was significantly lower in the RS than LS group (243.5 vs. 521.0 IU/L, p <.01). The morbidity rate (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥2) was similar between the groups. There were no significant differences between the LS and RS groups in the 3‐year overall survival rate (80.7% vs. 74.5%, respectively; p =.95) or 3‐year disease‐free survival rate (75.0% vs. 69.7%, respectively; p =.95). Conclusions: RS for primary T3 or more AGC was safe and contributed to similar short‐term and long‐term outcomes compared with LS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]