Comparison of intraepidermal nerve fiber density and confocal corneal microscopy for neuropathy.

Objective Methods Results Interpretation Clinical Trial Registration Compare the diagnostic characteristics of intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and confocal corneal microscopy (CCM) for distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) and small fiber neuropathy (SFN).Participants with obesity were recruited from bariatric surgery clinics and testing was performed prior to surgery. DSP and SFN were determined using the Toronto consensus definitions of probable neuropathy. IENFD was assessed from 3 mm punch biopsies of the distal leg and proximal thigh. CCM was performed on both eyes with manual and automated counting. The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (MNSIq) was also completed. Diagnostic capability was determined using areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) from logistic regression.We enrolled 140 participants (mean [standard deviation [SD]] age: 50.3 years [7.1], 77.1% female, BMI: 44.4 kg/m2 [6.7]). In this population, 22.9% had DSP and 14.3% had SFN. Distal leg IENFD had the largest AUC (95% confidence interval) for DSP (0.78, 0.68–0.89) and SFN (0.85, 0.75–0.96). Proximal thigh IENFD (DSP: AUC: 0.59, 0.48–0.69, SFN: AUC: 0.59, 0.46–0.73) and CCM metrics (DSP: AUC range: 0.55–0.60, SFN: AUC range: 0.45–0.62) had poorer diagnostic capability than distal leg IENFD for DSP/SFN (P < 0.05). MNSIq had similar diagnostic capability to distal leg IENFD for both DSP/SFN (DSP: AUC: 0.76, 0.68–0.85, SFN: AUC: 0.81, 0.73–0.88). More participants (52%) preferred skin biopsies to CCM.Distal leg IENFD was the best quantitative measure of DSP/SFN. CCM had poor diagnostic characteristics and fewer patients preferred this test to IENFD. The MNSIq had similar diagnostic characteristics to distal leg IENFD, indicating its value as a diagnostic tool in the clinical setting.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03617185. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]