Back to Search Start Over

Revision ACL reconstruction, but not bilateral ACL reconstruction, is associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACL reconstruction: A comparative analysis of 6831 patients.

Authors :
Cristiani, Riccardo
Hamrin Senorski, Eric
Helito, Camilo P.
Samuelsson, Kristian
Stålman, Anders
Source :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. Oct2024, p1. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose Methods Results Conclusions Level of Evidence To evaluate and compare the subjective knee function in patients undergoing revision and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with those undergoing primary ACLR in a large cohort.Patients without concomitant ligament injuries who underwent primary, revision or bilateral ACLR at the Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2005 and 2018 were identified. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Patients who underwent revision and bilateral ACLR were compared with those who underwent primary ACLR (control group) using Student's <italic>t</italic> test.A total of 6831 patients (6102 with primary ACLRs, 343 with revision ACLRs and 386 with bilateral ACLRs) were included. Preoperatively, there were significant but nonclinically relevant differences in favour of the revision ACLR group for KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport/Rec subscale scores compared with the primary ACLR group. Postoperatively, except for the 1‐year Symptoms and ADL subscales, the revision ACLR group reported significantly lower scores on all KOOS subscales than the primary ACLR group, with clinically relevant differences (>8–10 points) for the 1‐, 2‐ and 5‐year Sport/Rec and Quality of Life (QOL) subscales. The bilateral ACLR group reported significantly, but not clinically relevant, inferior scores on the 1‐year Symptoms and QOL subscales and the 5‐year Sport/Rec and QOL subscales compared with the primary ACLR group.Revision ACLR, but not bilateral ACLR, was associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACLR. It is important to counsel patients regarding their future subjective knee function after repeated ACLR. Compared to primary ACLR, inferior subjective results should be expected after revision ACLR, but not after bilateral ACLR.Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09422056
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180187134
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12496