More knee reinjuries after ACL reconstruction compared to nonsurgical treatment of the ACL. A 2‐year follow‐up of the NACOX prospective cohort study.

Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Level of Evidence To describe knee reinjuries and surgeries within 2 years after an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, in patients treated with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR).Two years follow‐up of 275 patients (52% females, mean age 25.2 [SD 7.0] years) about knee reinjuries and surgeries were analysed from the prospective NACOX cohort study, aiming to describe recovery after an acute ACL injury treated according to clinical routine. Knee reinjury was defined as increase or new symptoms due to new trauma. At 2 years after injury, 169 (61%) had undergone an ACLR. Results are presented with descriptive statistics and risk ratios (RR).Thirty‐two patients sustained reinjuries within 2 years; 6 in the non‐ACLR group, and 26 in the ACLR group (7 before and 19 after ACLR). Twelve patients in the ACLR group sustained a graft rupture and three did an ACL revision. Patients with non‐ACLR, aged 21–25 years, had a 5.9‐fold higher risk for reinjury than those aged 15–20 years (RR 5.9 [1.3–26.9]; <italic>p</italic> = 0.012). Twenty‐four patients had surgery in the non‐ACLR group and 36 patients in the ACLR group (excluding primary ACLR), where six were before ACLR and 30 were after ACLR.Twelve percent sustained a knee reinjury and 21% underwent knee surgery within 2 years after the index ACL injury. There was a higher reinjury incidence in the ACLR group, but no difference in incidence of surgeries. Thus, ACLR did not reduce the risk of traumatic reinjuries or surgeries, which is important for treatment decision considerations.Level I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]