Back to Search Start Over

Challenges and opportunities of recovering lithium from seawater, produced water, geothermal brines, and salt lakes using conventional and emerging technologies.

Authors :
Nikkhah, Hasan
Ipekçi, Deniz
Xiang, Wenjun
Stoll, Zachary
Xu, Pei
Li, Baikun
McCutcheon, Jeffrey R.
Beykal, Burcu
Source :
Chemical Engineering Journal. Oct2024, Vol. 498, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

[Display omitted] • Lithium supply challenges prompt reevaluation of sourcing strategies. • Technological bottlenecks of different lithium extraction techniques are identified. • The effectiveness of lithium extraction technologies is assessed across different feedstocks. • Integration of mature and emerging technologies would enhance lithium recovery. • Chemical precipitation has the highest operational cost compared to other technologies. Energy storage plays a crucial role in the modern energy landscape, with its applications spanning from renewable energy integration to the electrification of transportation and microgrids. Lithium is a key component of lithium-ion batteries at the core of energy storage technologies. Increasing demand for lithium has challenged supply chains and required a rethinking of how we source it. This comprehensive review presents a critical and holistic assessment of the opportunities and challenges of sourcing lithium from diverse feedstocks, such as seawater, geothermal, produced water (oilfield), and salt lake brines. We assess various lithium extraction technologies (precipitation, extraction, electrochemical techniques, and membrane processes) considering these three feedstocks. A quantitative comparative analysis is conducted across all technologies, considering factors such as cost, commercial maturity, operation duration, and other relevant parameters to determine the most promising technologies for each feedstock while identifying remaining research and technological gaps. Our analysis reveals that Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technologies, characterized by higher selectivity and lower environmental impact, demonstrate significant promise for enhancing lithium yields from geothermal brines. In contrast, membrane processes are identified as more suited for seawater and salt lake brines, offering cost-effective scalability despite challenges with selectivity and membrane fouling. Ultimately, the efficient integration of these technologies is illustrated for harvesting lithium from each unconventional resource. The analysis shows that adsorption and chemical precipitation are the commercial technologies for lithium recovery from geothermal, salt lake, and oilfield brine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13858947
Volume :
498
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180173847
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349