Back to Search Start Over

Short-term and three-year long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer following self-expandable metallic stent placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors :
Kanaka, Shintaro
Yamada, Takeshi
Matsuda, Akihisa
Uehara, Kay
Shinji, Seiichi
Yokoyama, Yasuyuki
Takahashi, Goro
Iwai, Takuma
Takeda, Kohki
Kuriyama, Sho
Miyasaka, Toshimitsu
Yoshida, Hiroshi
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques. Oct2024, Vol. 38 Issue 10, p5514-5527. 14p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: A bridge to surgery (BTS) after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a widely recognized treatment strategy for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, there is still a lack of evidence for the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of open surgery following SEMS placement in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Methods: An electronic literature search through to December 2022 was performed to identify studies comparing short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery following SEMS placement for obstructive colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were postoperative complication rates and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates. The meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effects methods to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: The meta-analysis included 15 studies and 883 patients, of whom 467 (52.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 416 (47.1%) underwent open surgery following SEMS placement. The postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32–0.67, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 3-year RFS rate or 3-year OS rate between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (3-year RFS, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50–1.24, P = 0.30; 3-year OS, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41–1.12, P = 0.13). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that the short-term outcome was better in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement than in those who underwent open surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between the two groups. Laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement may be a safe and effective treatment option for obstructive colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18666817
Volume :
38
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180131598
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11187-x