Back to Search Start Over

Primary Results of Patients with Genitourinary Malignancies Presented at a Molecular Tumor Board.

Authors :
Michaelis, Jakob
Himmelsbach, Ruth
Metzger, Patrick
Lassmann, Silke
Börries, Melanie
Werner, Martin
Miething, Cornelius
Höfflin, Rouven
Illert, Anna L.
Duyster, Justus
Becker, Heiko
Sigle, August
Gratzke, Christian
Grabbert, Markus
Source :
Urologia Internationalis. 2024, Vol. 108 Issue 5, p383-391. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Personalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While the therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology and molecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology. Methods: We analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations. Results: We evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period, 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients – due to different reasons – received the recommended MTB-based therapy though, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time. Conclusion: Presentation of uro-oncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00421138
Volume :
108
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Urologia Internationalis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180117707
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000538908