Temporal trends in medical device implant procedures in Australia 2008–22: evidence from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Hospital Morbidity database.

Objective: Examine the temporal trends in medical device implant procedures in the Australian population. Methods: We used data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare from the financial years 2007–08 to 2021–22 and chose the most frequently performed medical device implant procedures. We estimated the annual change in volume of procedures and age-standardised rates by calculating the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and used regression with the Newey–West robust variance estimator to examine whether there was a linear trend in the age-standardised rates for each procedure. Results: For procedures including cardiac pacemakers, heart valves, hip and knee arthroplasties, and intraocular lenses, the crude CAGR was over 3%. For the age-standardised rates, the CAGR was largest for cardiac pacemaker, followed by heart valve replacement and hip arthroplasty procedures. For some procedures, the growth was more than in the Australian population, including cardiac pacemakers (β = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.14–1.86), heart valve replacements (β = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.28–0.54), hip arthroplasty (β = 3.50; 95% CI: 1.61–5.38), and knee arthroplasty (β = 4.31; 95% CI: 0.54–8.09) procedures. The trend of standardised rates of procedures, including incisional hernia with mesh, breast implants, coronary stents, and cardiac defibrillators, grew at the same rate as the population, whereas the rate for gastric banding procedures decreased (β = −3.14; 95% CI: −4.92 to −1.34). Conclusion: The findings from the current study, showing a large increase in medical device implant procedures, will assist in future healthcare planning and efforts in post-market surveillance of safety of medical devices. What is known on this topic? Previous studies investigated trends in medical device implants on either a particular medical procedure or total procedures conducted on particular anatomical sites. What this study adds? Unlike previous studies, this study investigates a general population-level trend analysis of all major device implants using the most recent national-level database, covering all hospitals in Australia. What are the implications for practitioners? Findings from this study are useful for future healthcare planning and allocation of resources for the healthcare delivery of necessary healthcare to patients in Australia. In addition, the results can be used to inform efforts to improve post-marked surveillance of medical devices by providing estimates of the volume and standardised rates of procedures for type of devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]