Back to Search Start Over

De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

Authors :
Tinterri, Corrado
Barbieri, Erika
Sagona, Andrea
Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone
Gentile, Damiano
Source :
Cancers. Sep2024, Vol. 16 Issue 18, p3168. 16p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Simple Summary: This study evaluates the long-term oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) compared to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Analyzing data from 322 patients, the study found that SLNB is associated with better long-term outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), compared to ALND. The axillary recurrence rates for SLNB ranged between 0.9% and 2.1%, comparable to those reported in other studies. Despite the high false-negative rates previously associated with SLNB, this study's findings support its safety and effectiveness in this patient population. Overall, SLNB is a viable alternative to ALND, offering better long-term oncological outcomes without increasing the risk of axillary recurrence. Backgrounds: This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6–2.1%). Conclusions: SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20726694
Volume :
16
Issue :
18
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancers
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180008845
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183168