Back to Search Start Over

Insight into the status of plasma renin and aldosterone measurement: findings from 526 clinical laboratories in China.

Authors :
Zhou, Weiyan
Deng, Yuhang
Ma, Wenjun
Zhao, Haijian
Wang, Kaijun
Zhang, Qian
Gan, Wei
Chen, Wenxiang
Cai, Jun
Zhang, Chuanbao
Source :
Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine. Oct2024, Vol. 62 Issue 11, p2233-2241. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Accurate measurements of renin and aldosterone levels play an important role in primary aldosteronism screening, which is of great importance in the management and categorization of hypertension. The objective of this study is to investigate the current status of plasma renin and aldosterone measurements in China, which is achieved by analyzing the results of 526 clinical laboratories nationwide for three pooled fresh plasma samples derived from more than 2,000 patients. Renin and aldosterone in three pooled plasma samples were measured four times in 526 laboratories employing various measurement systems. The inter- and intra-laboratory %CV were calculated and compared. To determine the source of the substantial inter-laboratory %CV, laboratories were categorized according to the measurement systems they are using, and both the inter- and intra-measurement-system %CV were calculated and compared. Regarding renin, the majority of laboratories use four primary commercial immunoassays. However, for aldosterone, in addition to commercial immunoassays, laboratory-developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods are also used by laboratories. The median values of intra-laboratory %CVs, intra-measurement-system %CVs, inter-laboratory %CVs, and inter-measurement systems %CVs varied between 1.6 and 2.6 %, 4.6 and 14.9 %, 8.3 and 25.7 %, and 10.0 and 34.4 % for renin, respectively. For aldosterone, these values ranged from 1.4 to 2.2 %, 2.5–14.7 %, 9.9–31.0 %, and 10.0–35.5 %, respectively. The precision within laboratories and measurement systems for plasma renin and aldosterone measurements is satisfactory. However, the comparability between laboratories using different measurement systems remains lacking, indicating the long way to achieve standardization and harmonization for these two analytes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14346621
Volume :
62
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179977728
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0373