Back to Search Start Over

(Cost‐)effectiveness of personalised multimodal physiotherapy compared to surgery in patients with cervical radiculopathy: A systematic review.

Authors :
Klein Heerenbrink, Sebastiaan
Coenen, Pieter
Coppieters, Michel W.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Vleggeert‐Lankamp, Carmen L. A.
Rooker, Servan
ter Meulen, Bastiaan C.
Bosboom, Johannes L. W.
Bouma, Gerrit J.
Lutke Schipholt, Ivo J.
Sleijser‐Koehorst, Marije L. S.
de Vries, Ralph
Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
Scholten‐Peeters, Gwendolyne G. M.
Source :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Oct2024, Vol. 30 Issue 7, p1227-1238. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Rationale: Cervical radiculopathy is initially typically managed conservatively. Surgery is indicated when conservative management fails or with severe/progressive neurological signs. Personalised multimodal physiotherapy could be a promising conservative strategy. However, aggregated evidence on the (cost‐)effectiveness of personalised multimodal physiotherapy compared to surgery with/without post‐operative physiotherapy is lacking. Aim/Objectives: To systematically summarise the literature on the (cost‐)effectiveness of personalised multimodal physiotherapy compared to surgery with or without post‐operative physiotherapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched from inception to 1st of March 2023. Primary outcomes were effectiveness regarding costs, arm pain intensity and disability. Neck pain intensity, perceived recovery, quality of life, neurological symptoms, range‐of‐motion, return‐to‐work, medication use, (re)surgeries and adverse events were considered secondary outcomes. Randomised clinical trials comparing personalised multimodal physiotherapy versus surgical approaches with/without post‐operative physiotherapy were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data‐extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2 and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. Certainty of the evidence was determined using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Results: From 2109 records, eight papers from two original trials, with 117 participants in total were included. Low certainty evidence showed there were no significant differences on arm pain intensity and disability, except for the subscale 'heavy work' related disability (12 months) and disability at 5–8 years. Cost‐effectiveness was not assessed. There was low certainty evidence that physiotherapy improved significantly less on neck pain intensity, sensory loss and perceived recovery compared to surgery with/without physiotherapy. Low certainty evidence showed there were no significant differences on numbness, range of motion, medication use, and quality of life. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Considering the clinical importance of accurate management recommendations and the current low level of certainty, high‐quality cost‐effectiveness studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13561294
Volume :
30
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179878316
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14036