Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v.1.1) for the Treatment of Extracranial Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Radiosurgery.

Authors :
Yu, J.B.
Qureshi, S.
Jairam, V.
Yu, L.M.
Pendyala, P.
Riaz, A.
Corn, B.W.
Sapir, E.
Ennis, R.D.
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2024 Supplement, Vol. 120 Issue 2, pe806-e807. 2p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) magnitude of clinical benefit (MCBS) version 1.1 is an evaluation scale that is intended to measure the clinical benefit of a cancer-directed treatment. The MCBS scores treatments from 1 through 5 for non-curative therapy, with 1 being lowest clinical benefit vs. 5 being highest. In 2023, ASTRO and ESTRO published joint guidelines for the use of local radiotherapy in the management of extracranial Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (OM-NSCLC). We applied the ESMO-MCBS v.1.1 to studies used to inform the guideline. The ASTRO/ESTRO guidelines were informed by 24 studies. These 24 studies were graded by the consensus of at least 3 authors according to ESMO-MCBS v1.1. When a score could not be assigned, the study was noted to be "unscorable" and the reason for the inability to score was recorded. Five studies were deemed scoreable. Nineteen single-arm and retrospective studies could not be scored. One study (Gomez) was published twice (initial report and update with longer follow up). Scores are shown in the table below. The highest scores given were 4, for randomized comparative studies that showed improvement in overall survival. The use of local radiation in the treatment of extracranial OM-NSCLC is associated with a strong but not the highest clinical benefit, according to the ESMO MCBS v1.1. Radiotherapy associated scores of 4 were comparable to scores assigned to more expensive therapies such as pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed for EGFR and ALK negative metastatic NSCLC. Therefore, we hypothesize that that the "value" of radiotherapy is even greater than high-cost systemic therapies that have equivalent high clinical benefit. Future studies evaluating the benefit of local radiotherapy for OM-NSCLC should be randomized studies that also include evaluations of quality of life to raise scores above 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
120
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179876690
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.1771