Forecasts and Contingencies: From Methodology to Policy.

A "folk criticism" in political science maintains that the discipline should confine its efforts to explanation and avoid venturing down the dark, dirty, and dangerous path to forecasting and prediction. I argue that not only is this position inconsistent with the experiences of other sciences, but in fact the questions involved in making robust and valid predictions invoke many core methodological issues in political analysis. Those issues include, among others, the question of the level of predictability in political behavior, the problem of case selection in small-N situations, and the various alternative models that could be used to formalize predictions. This essay focuses on the problem of forecasting in international politics, and concludes by noting some of the problems of institutional culture-bureaucratic and academic-that have inhibited greater use of systematic forecasting methods in foreign policy. Check author’s web site for an updated version of the paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]