Localising the Global Goal on Adaptation through intersectional thinking.

This viewpoint explores how intersectional thinking can help localise the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA) to promote equity and justice in climate adaptation. Localising the GGA is essential for translating global objectives into actionable strategies at the local level. Adaptation goalsetting and current adaptation measurement approaches are hindered by the complexity of establishing shared metrics, the myopic focus on compliance and reporting, and the neglect of the dynamic, context-specific nature of adaptation processes. By incorporating intersectional thinking, we argue for a more nuanced approach that considers the compounded sources of vulnerability, especially in urban areas, where marginalised groups are disproportionately affected by climate impacts. We apply an Intersectional Climate Justice framework to guide the localisation of the GGA throughout the adaptation policy cycle, from impact, vulnerability, and risk assessment, to planning, implementation, and measurement. Embedding intersectional thinking throughout the GGA's adaptation policy cycle aligns global goals with local realities, enabling local actors to develop more comprehensive, context-specific strategies that address the needs and priorities of vulnerable communities. We also highlight the potential of intersectional climate justice to bridge climate action and broader development goals, ultimately fostering more equitable and just futures. • GGA lacks actionable framework, challenging practical implementation. • Localising the GGA ensures adaptation strategies reflect local needs and priorities. • Intersectional climate justice aligns local adaptation with global goals. • Intersectional thinking addresses social determinants of climate vulnerability. • Cities need intersectional approaches to tackle climate change impacts effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]