Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of selective dry cow therapies based on 2 different algorithms on antimicrobial use, udder health, milk production, and culling in the absence of internal teat sealant use at dry-off.
- Source :
-
Journal of Dairy Science . Oct2024, Vol. 107 Issue 10, p8259-8270. 12p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) strategies based on 2 different algorithms in comparison with blanket dry cow therapy for measures of udder health, milk yield, and culling in herds not using internal teat sealant. Cows from 2 commercial farms in west Texas were randomized into 3 different groups: SDCT algorithm 1 (ALG1; n = 455) cows treated with an intramammary antimicrobial at dry-off if SCC >200,000 cells/mL at any Dairy Herd Improvement Association test date or if the cow had 2 or more cases of clinical mastitis (CM) during the enrollment lactation; SDCT algorithm 2 (ALG2; n = 458) cows treated with an intramammary antimicrobial at dry-off if SCC >200,000 cell/mL at last test date or any case of CM during the enrollment lactation; and control cows (CON = 447) received blanket dry cow therapy. None of the cows enrolled in the study received an internal or external teat sealant. Data related to milk and SCC linear score (LSCC) were collected monthly. Milk yield and LSCC during the first 6 mo of lactation were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA models, while Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to culling and CM data. The farm was fitted as a random effect in all models. The percentage of cows receiving antimicrobials at dry-off was 51.3%, 24.7%, and 100% for ALG1, ALG2, and CON, respectively. Treatment did not influence the IMI dynamics during the dry period. Additionally, no statistical differences related to treatment were observed for LSCC and milk yield. The LSCC for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows was 2.44, 2.41, and 2.26, respectively. The average milk yield for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows was 43.2, 43.2, and 44.0 kg/d, respectively. Treatment did not affect CM incidence or culling. The cumulative incidence of CM was 19.6%, 19.4%, and 21.4% for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows, respectively. Additionally, the cumulative risk of death or culling was 18.5%, 17.1%, and 19.5% for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows, respectively. In conclusion, SDCT strategies led to a decrease in antimicrobial drug use at dry-off, without significantly affecting the incidence of CM, the risk of culling, LSCC, or milk yield of dairy cows. However, numerical differences in LSCC and milk yield were observed between treatment groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *ANIMAL herds
*RANDOM effects model
*MILK yield
*DAIRY cattle
*COWS
*HEALTH of cattle
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00220302
- Volume :
- 107
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 179763633
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23981