Back to Search Start Over

High-precision estimation of plant alpha diversity in different ecosystems based on Sentinel-2 data.

Authors :
Xin, Jiaxun
Li, Jinning
Zeng, Qingqiu
Peng, Yu
Wang, Yan
Teng, Xiaoyi
Bao, Qianru
Yang, Linyan
Tang, Huining
Liu, Yuqi
Xie, Jiayao
Qi, Yue
Liu, Guanchen
Li, Xuyao
Tang, Ning
Sun, Zhenyao
Zeng, Weiying
Wei, Ziyu
Chen, Heyuan
He, Lizheng
Source :
Ecological Indicators. Sep2024, Vol. 166, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• Satellite high-precision estimation for plant diversity is extremely needed. • Simple linear regression models were the worst. • Partial linear regression model was moderate. • Random forest model performed best. • NDVI and its standard deviation are the best predictors for plant alpha diversity. At present, the accuracy of remote sensing estimation models of plant alpha diversity is generally low, and high-precision estimation models in deciduous broadleaved forest (DBF), deciduous coniferous forest (DCF) and evergreen coniferous forest (ECF) are still lacking. The main purpose of this study is to construct high-precision remote sensing models for plant alpha diversity in multiple ecosystems at global scale. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were derived from Sentinel-2 data. NDVI and NDVI based spectral diversity/heterogeneity indices were selected as predictive variables, and alpha diversity indices were selected as response variables. Simple linear regression (SLR), partial linear regression (PLSR), and random forest (RF) models were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the predictive variables against the response variables under six ecosystems (evergreen broadleaved forest (EBF), DBF, ECF, DCF, shrub, and grassland), and to compare the estimated robustness of various spectral diversity indices. In terms of prediction accuracy, the SLR models were the worst, and the PLSR model were average. RF performed best, outperforming most current models. Especially in DBF, ECF, shrub and grassland, the determination coefficient R2 of RF models can be as high as 0.9. In terms of the prediction of α-diversity, the prediction effect of species richness was better than that of Shannon index, Simpson index and Pielou index. The higher the vegetation complexity, the more accurate the assessment of vegetation α-diversity tends to be, especially in DBF, shrub and grassland. According to the importance of predictive variables and model stability evaluation results, NDVI, standard deviation of NDVI (SD), and NDVI derived Shannon's diversity index (Sha), Cumulative Residual Entropy (CRE), Pielou's evenness index (Pie), Hill's numbers (Hill), Berger-Parker's diversity index (Ber), Parametric Rao's index of quadratic entropy (paRao) are all powerful indicators for predicting plant alpha diversity. Among them, the prediction performance of NDVI and SD is better. This study is not only an exploration of the practicability of R package "rasterdiv", but also an attempt to construct high-precision remote sensing estimation models of plant alpha diversity at global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1470160X
Volume :
166
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Ecological Indicators
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179694599
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112527