Conventional versus high-voltage, long-term pulse Radiofrequency of ganglion impar in perineal pain with advanced rectal cancer: a Randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

MLA

Li, Qin, et al. “Conventional versus High-Voltage, Long-Term Pulse Radiofrequency of Ganglion Impar in Perineal Pain with Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial.” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 24, no. 1, Sept. 2024, pp. 1–10. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02717-0.

APA

Li, Q., Wang, H., Zhong, B., Zhang, T., Wang, Z., Tao, P., Zou, J., & Zhang, A. (2024). Conventional versus high-voltage, long-term pulse Radiofrequency of ganglion impar in perineal pain with advanced rectal cancer: a Randomized, double-blind controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02717-0

Chicago

Li, Qin, Huaiming Wang, Bo Zhong, Taomei Zhang, Zhiqiang Wang, Ping Tao, Jiang Zou, and Aimin Zhang. 2024. “Conventional versus High-Voltage, Long-Term Pulse Radiofrequency of Ganglion Impar in Perineal Pain with Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial.” BMC Anesthesiology 24 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12871-024-02717-0.