Comparison of leg wound complications in endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvesting techniques: A Comparative prospective study.

Background:Saphenous vein harvesting for Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) can be done by open and endoscopic methods. The present study aimed to evaluate the leg wound complications between endoscopic and open saphenous vein harvesting techniques. Materials and Methods:This study was conducted in the department of General Surgery, Sree Mookambika Institute of Medical Sciences, Kulasekharam, Tamil Nadu. Patients who underwent elective CABG were included in the study. A total of 50 patients were included in the study and divided into two groups each of 25 patients. All the patients demographic data, clinical and surgical data was recorded and analyzed. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0) version used for analysis. Results:The mean age, gender distribution, comorbid conditions and euro score-II not showed any significant difference between the groups. In group-I and group-II maximum number of patients had one leg and thigh for vein harvest site. Harvested time and incision closure time showed significant difference between groups. Diabetes mellitus is common risk factor in both groups. Maximum number of patients in group-II had infection compare to group-I. Conclusion :The study results concluded that endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting technique have more advantages with less complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]