Back to Search Start Over

A meta-review of screening and treatment of electronic "addictions".

Authors :
Hogan, Jasara N.
Heyman, Richard E.
Smith Slep, Amy M.
Source :
Clinical Psychology Review. Nov2024, Vol. 113, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Concerns surrounding electronic addictions, an umbrella term including any clinically significant technology-based addictive problem, have increased as technology has advanced. Although researchers and clinicians have observed detrimental effects associated with excessive technology use, there is no agreed-on definition or set of criteria for these problems. The lack of a consistent understanding of electronic addictions has led to a lack of consistency in both assessment and treatment studies, precluding strong recommendations for effective screening and clinical intervention. This meta-review integrates findings from 22 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of electronic addictions to determine which measures and interventions may effectively measure and treat electronic addictions. We conducted a meta-review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Findings suggest that although some measures may have good internal consistency and reliability among college students, there was a general lack of consistency in how measures were used across studies, making comparison difficult. Psychological and exercise-based interventions were shown to reduce symptoms of electronic addictions short-term, but no treatment was superior to others in overall symptom reduction. Most included reviews raise serious concerns about the lack of consensus on what constitutes an electronic addiction. Consequently, it was not possible to draw conclusions about the overall efficacy of any measurement tools or interventions. We provide suggestions for next steps to establish the phenomenology of electronic addictions before additional research on assessment and intervention is conducted. • Electronic addictions, broadly defined, are an area of increasing interest with no unifying definition. • Without standardization of terms and symptoms, it is not possible to judge assessment tool adequacy or treatment efficacy. • Foundational work is needed to determine if electronic addictions are primary disorders before conducting future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02727358
Volume :
113
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Psychology Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179464597
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102468