Comparison of two methods of greater occipital nerve block in patients with chronic migraine: ultrasound-guided and landmark-based techniques.

Background: Migraine is a primary headache defined as moderate-to-severe pain lasting 4 to 72 h, ranking 2nd among the disabling conditions for both genders regardless of the age and the greater occipital nerve (GON) block has been reported as an efficient treatment method for migraine. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the efficiency of the two methods of GON block, i.e., the ultrasound (US)-guided technique and the landmark-based technique. Method: Having a prospective and randomized design, the study assigned the patients with chronic migraine into two groups after which a neurologist performed landmark-based GON block in the first group while an algologist performed US-guided GON block in the second group. During the 3-month follow-up period, the number of days with pain, the duration of pain, the number of analgesic drugs taken in a month, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were compared with the values ​​before treatment and at the 1st week, 1st month, and 3rd month after treatment. Results: US-guided GON block group included 34 patients while there were 32 patients in the landmark-based GON block group. US-guided GON block group showed significantly reduced VAS scores and frequency of attacks compared to the landmark-based GON block group at Month 1 after the procedure. After a 3-month follow-up period of the two groups, the frequency of attacks, analgesic intake and the duration of attacks were lower in both groups compared to the baseline. At 3-month follow-up, the mean of VAS scores decreased from 9,47 ± 2,69 to 4,67 ± 1,9 in US-guided GON block group and from 9,46 ± 0,98 to 7 ± 2,5 in the landmark-based GON block group. Conclusion: It was determined that both US-guided and landmark-based GON block were efficient techniques in patients with chronic migraine. US-guided GON block technique resulted in lower VAS scores, shorter durations of pain, lower frequencies of attack, and lower intake of analgesics compared to the landmark-based GON block technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]