Dynamic Bayesian networks for spatiotemporal modeling and its uncertainty in tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: a case study in the Tarim River Basin, China.

Ecosystem services (ESs) refer to the benefits that humans obtain from ecosystems. These services are subject to environmental changes and human interventions, which introduce a significant level of uncertainty. Traditional ES modeling approaches often employ Bayesian networks, but they fall short in capturing spatiotemporal dynamic change processes. To address this limitation, dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) have emerged as stochastic models capable of incorporating uncertainty and capturing dynamic changes. Consequently, DBNs have found increasing application in ES modeling. However, the structure and parameter learning of DBNs present complexities within the field of ES modeling. To mitigate the reliance on expert knowledge, this study proposes an algorithm for structure and parameter learning, integrating the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-Offs) model with DBNs to develop a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal dynamics and uncertainty of ESs in the Tarim River Basin, China from 2000 to 2020. The study further evaluates the tradeoffs and synergies among four key ecosystem services: water yield, habitat quality, sediment delivery ratio, and carbon storage and sequestration. The findings show that (1) the proposed structure learning and parameter learning algorithm for DBNs, including the hill-climb algorithm, linear analysis, the Markov blanket, and the EM algorithm, effectively address subjective factors that can influence model learning when dealing with uncertainty; (2) significant spatial heterogeneity is observed in the supply of ESs within the Tarim River Basin, with notable changes in habitat quality, water yield, and sediment delivery ratios occurring between 2000–2005, 2010–2015, and 2015–2020, respectively; (3) tradeoffs exist between water yield and habitat quality, as well as between soil conservation and carbon sequestration, while synergies are found among habitat quality, soil retention, and carbon sequestration. The land-use type emerges as the most influential factor affecting the tradeoffs and synergies of ESs. This study serves to validate the capacity of DBNs in addressing spatiotemporal dynamic changes and establishes an improved research methodology for ES modeling that considers uncertainty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]