Birth weight and thoracoscopic approach for patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula—a retrospective cohort study.

Background: This study aimed to analyze the results, feasibility and safety of the thoracoscopic approach for patients with esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) depending on the patient's birth weight. Methods: The study involved only type C and D EA/TEF. Among the analyzed parameters were the patients' characteristics, surgical treatment and post-operative complications: early mortality, anastomosis leakage, anastomosis strictures, chylothorax, TEF recurrence, and the need for fundoplication or gastrostomy. Results: 145 consecutive newborns underwent thoracoscopic EA with TEF repair. They were divided into three groups—A (N = 12 with a birth weight < 1500 g), B (N = 23 with a birth weight ≥ 1500 g but < 2000 g), and C—control group (N = 110 with a birth weight ≥ 2000 g). Primary one-stage anastomosis was performed in 11/12 (91.7%) patients—group A, 19/23 (82.6%)—group B and 110 (100%)—group C. Early mortality was 3/12 (25%)—group A, 2/23 (8.7%)—group B, and 2/110 (1.8%)—group C and was not directly related to the surgical repair. There were no significant differences in operative time and the following complications: anastomotic leakage, recurrent TEF, esophageal strictures, and chylothorax. There were no conversions to an open surgery. Fundoplication was required in 0%—group A, 4/21 (19.0%)—group B, and 2/108 (1.9%)—group C survivors. Gastrostomy was performed in 1/9 (11.1%)—group A, 3/21 (14.3%)—group B and 0%—group C. Conclusion: In an experienced surgeon's hands, even in the smallest newborns, the thoracoscopic approach may be safe, feasible, and worthy of consideration. Birth weight seems to be not a direct contraindication to the thoracoscopic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]