EU constitutional dismantling through strategic informalisation: Soft readmission governance as concerted dis‐integration.

This contribution takes issue with what I have called the 'constitutional dismantling' of external migration policy through the tactical informalisation of readmission cooperation. It maps out the strategic use of soft law mediating the tacit approval or active involvement of the main EU actors. The strategy is supposed to enhance policy outcomes but is at the expense of foundational principles. The principles of conferral, institutional balance, and sincere/loyal cooperation impose key constraints on EU/Member State action that the choice for soft law ignores. My main contention is that this is not an unintended consequence, but a deliberate or, at least, tolerated result, amounting to a form of 'concerted dis‐integration' pursued by the very actors supposed to guard the EU integration project in line with Treaty provisions. The approach denotes the instrumentalisation of legal mechanisms for the advancement of policy objectives, embracing a regulation‐without‐legitimation paradigm that unravels the EU's constitutional framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]