The electrophysiology of sequential adjustments of dual‐task order coordination.

Performing two tasks simultaneously involves the coordination of their processing. This task coordination is particularly required in dual‐task situations with varying task orders. When task order switches between subsequent trials, task order coordination leads to task order switch costs in comparison with order repetitions. However, it is open, whether task order coordination is exclusively controlled by the relation of the task orders of the current and the previous trials, or whether additional conditions such as task order before the previous trial leads to a behavioral and neural adjustment of task order coordination. To answer this question, we reanalyzed the data of two previously published experiments with order‐cued dual‐task paradigms. We did so with regard to whether task order switch costs and the EEG component order‐switch positivity in the current dual‐task trial would be modulated by order switches vs. repetitions in the previous trial (Trial N‐1). In Experiment 1, we found a modulation of the task order switch costs in RTs and response reversals; these costs were reduced after an order switch compared with order repetitions in Trial N‐1. In Experiment 2, there were no effects on the task order switch costs in the behavioral data. Nonetheless, we found the order‐switch positivity to be strongly modulated by the order transition of the previous trial in both experiments. The order‐switch positivity was substantially reduced if the previous trial was an order switch (compared to an order repetition) by itself. This implies that order coordination of dual tasks is adjusted in a gradual way depending on trial's history. The present study investigates the neurophysiological effects of task‐order coordination and its meta‐control adjustment in dual‐task situations. The EEG component order‐switch positivity was modulated by task‐order coordination and by coordination adjustment. This implies that order coordination of dual tasks is adjusted in a gradual way depending on the trial's history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]