Back to Search Start Over

How is variability in physiological responses to social stress related to punishment and reward sensitivities? Preliminary findings from the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality perspective.

Authors :
Sözer, Ömer Taha
Dereboy, Çiğdem
İzgialp, İpek
Source :
Anxiety, Stress & Coping. Sep2024, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p667-684. 18p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Although personality traits are assumed to have biological/physiological foundations, research has yielded mixed evidence regarding the relationship between personality and physiological stress responses. Moreover, the field has often overlooked the contemporary neuroscience-based personality approach, known as the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of Personality, in stress research. Method: The present study examined the relationship between the revised RST's personality dimensions and heart rate and skin conductance level (SCL) in response to the Trier Social Stress Test in a sample of 61 healthy university students. Results: Piecewise latent growth curve analysis controlling for the participants' current life stress, smoking use, and caffeine intake revealed that individuals with higher behavioral inhibition exhibited higher physiological reactivity, whereas those with high reward sensitivity showed smaller heart rate reactivity. The behavioral disengagement facet of the behavioral inhibition scale was associated with reduced sympathetic arousal during the stress task. Additionally, reward interest was associated with a larger recovery of SCL. Conclusion: Results were generally in line with the revised theory. The study findings were discussed within the paradigm of the approach-avoidance conflict and highlighted the importance of reward sensitivity in stress resilience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10615806
Volume :
37
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Anxiety, Stress & Coping
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179069666
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2290667